Books/Pseudonyms223 messages

Ruys, Piet was the pseudonym of Hagers, Pieter (1923-2004)

Vendelier, Mark was the pseudonym of Tervoort, Ben (Bernard Theodoor Marie) (1920-2006)

First (Hagers) done.

Vendelier is now done too.

Donker, Anthonie may be merged with Donkersloot, Nicolaas Anthonie (Anthonie Donker, Aart van der Alm, Siem d ...)

Marie (author at Callenbach) is the pseudonym of M.C. Camerlingh.

@jvo: modified, thank you

Gebroeders Grimm, Grimm, Gebroeders (Jakob en Wilhelm), Grimm, Gebroeders [naar] (Jakob en Wilhelm Grimm), Grimm, Jacob, Grimm, Jakob Ludwig Carl, Grimm, Wilhelm (Gebroeders Grimm)

verwijst allemaal naar:

- Jacob Ludwig Carl Grimm (1785-1863) en

-  Wilhelm Carl Grimm (1786-1859).

Kunnen al deze verwijzingen worden samengevoegd?

Brothers Grimm ,Grimm, Brothers (Jakob and Wilhelm) , Grimm, Brothers [to] (Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm) , Grimm, Jacob , Grimm, Jakob Ludwig Carl , Grimm, Wilhelm (Brothers Grimm)

all refers to:

- Jacob Ludwig Carl Grimm (1785-1863) and

-Wilhelm Carl Grimm (1786-1859) .

Can all these references be merged?

That may not be as fast as it may seem. And [to] is something completely different ...

In the meantime, I combined what was possible. The only correct solution is to remove that name and replace it with the names of both brothers for every item that now has Brothers Grimm as author. The same applies to the Brothers Grimm [after]. That should be two [to] 's. Handcraft to the shop.

Have now replaced "De Gebroeders" by their names. The question remains when are they both author and when is it [to]?

Enigma

Gosh, tight action!

It is [to] once another author uses their fairytales as the basis for a publication with sufficient autonomous components attributable to that new author. Something like ...

I had always understood that, but apparently not all importers. There are still some under the wrong heading (for both).

Enigma

Then the book is 6114441 that I recently included in my collection entitled Fairytales of Grimm is also a case where the two Brothers Grimm must be mentioned separately as author. The book was edited for the Netherlands by Onno Vere and Christine Doorman, but it was conceived by The Grimm Bros.

Administrator Vertigo has changed the author names to

Doorman, Christine , Grimm, Gebroeders [after] (Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm) , Vere, Onno

but that Gebroeders [to] (Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm) does not match the explanation above. They made up the stories about Hansel and Gretel, Little Red Riding Hood, Cinderella, etc., not the editors Vere and Doorman. Far too few autonomous components to name it [after] etc.

Obviously, there is always a compromise, because in a hard definition the subjective 'sufficient' does not belong. What is sufficient? A better definition is always welcome.

@jvo:

1. I changed the author names before Arco provided his explanation.

2. Actually, I just cut out a few names that certainly didn't belong there, including the completely superfluous "Grimm, Jakob Ludwig Carl" (we keep the most common name: Grimm, Jakob), which you had just performed for some unknown reason. .

3. You would have been honored if you had improved my version on the basis of the explanation.

Liv = Livia van Uitert

Processed.

Lady Courtmans = Courtmans-Berchmans, Johanna

Custom, thank you

Can you merge them too ?!

Can I too

Please Swan, S. Annie to Swan, Annie S.

Custom, with photo

To my surprise I see that Catawiki apparently knows for sure who Ben Traven was (Feige, Hermann Albert Otto Max (B. Traven)). However, no specific interpretation of this man can be found:

'' I doubt that question will ever have an answer, '' Dr. Guthke said. Ret Marut can be traced back to 1907. But where and what he was before that, nobody really knows. It is a question that is going to remain unsolved unless a miracle happens. ''

A decade ago, an investigation carried out by a team from the British Broadcasting Corporation, the results of which were later televised as a documentary and published as a book, '' The Man Who Was B. Traven, '' concluded that Traven had actually been Hermann Albert Otto Maximilian Feige, who was born in 1882 in the town of Swiebodzin in what today is Poland. But both Mrs. Lujan and Dr. Guthke find that hypothesis unconvincing.

https://www.nytimes.com/1990/06/25/books/his-widow-reveals-much-of-who-b-traven-really-was.html

And on the English Wikipedia page many theories pass but none have been proven. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._Traven#The_mystery_of_B._Traven's_biography

So perhaps it makes sense to leave it with B. Traven as long as there is no convincing evidence for either one or the other?

De KB komt met deze bewering: Ben Traven pseud. van Hermann Albert Otto Max Feige

The KB comes up with this claim: Ben Traven pseud. by Hermann Albert Otto Max Feige