Banknotes/Duplication18 messages

Er is geen verschil tussen 1058221 en 1841015.

Zelfs de foto's van e briefjes zijn hetzelfde.

There is no difference between 1058221 and 1841015 .

Even the photos of the notes are the same.

Good question. I don't actually see it. The first thing I looked at was the signature, but it was the same too.

Of course the signature is the same. The serial number is also the same.

Question, if this is the case, why isn't 1 of the 2 items removed? Is there a duplication removal policy and if so, where can I find it?

There are two ways to delete: reject or merge.

Every administrator can reject an item (in his section) if no users are linked to it (via shop, search list or collection) and the item is not has already been (partially) approved. That is no longer possible here in both cases.

They can be merged, whereby in principle the item with the most accurate information, the best images, the most users or the earliest entry date is preserved. All linked users then automatically move to the catalog item that is being maintained. However, this is an option only available to Super Administrators.

Apparently there is no Super Administrator with Banknotes, which explains why nothing is happening with it.

hmmm. and so ... Is there no possibility to bring this kind of case to Catawiki itself? I spent a month entering phone cards with the same thing happening. There are more and more duplications where different users use the different types while it is the same article.

By the way, one more question (sorry, am blond and can't find it in the forum itself, is there a way to create a forum topic? Is with a note from China with (probably allied propaganda) a print where I would like to ask the forum users if they can help me

You can change the title of the duplicate entry to Duplication of [catalog number of the correct version] . Someday in the future someone will feel called to clean up the case.

And top left of the page Banknotes-general there is a link" New topic ".

The duplicates with a catawikin number after them (so a la strip pins said) have been removed. there are 5 more - of which I don't know where it is a double - in the catalog

OK, hierbij nog een paar 2760503 4091339 3700503 3254043

OK, here's a few more 2760503 4091339 3700503 3254043

For those 100 drachmas: I also filled them in for the duplication; however, I thought there was indeed a difference because I think one is much more yellow and the other is more red in color.

what is the difference between 159461 and 2494875 ?

And 159309 , 4068087 and 3763519 ?

Almost another year has passed, and they are still neatly in place;)

http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/banknetten/landen/belgie/5271501-belgie-500-frank-100-belgas-doublure-van-2006457

http: // www .catawiki.nl / catalog / banknotes / series / national-bank-of-belgium / 5262729-belgium-100-franc-1978-double-of-2270125

http://www.catawiki.nl / catalog / banknotes / countries / belgium / 4211885-20-franc-belgium-1956-doublure

These may be combined ..

Sommige zaken duren langer dan andere en meer gebruikers zorgt voor meer fouten. Blijkbaar zijn sommige gebruikers niet in staat om te kijken naar wat er al gecategoriseerd is en plaatsen al hun biljetten opnieuw - en in veel gevallen nog met heel slecht fotowerk ook.

Afijn, gezamenlijke arbeid biedt gezamenlijke vreugd, ik heb afgelopen week tientalle doublures als doublure aangemerkt en ook diverse extra items toegevoegd als variant van de reeds ingevoerde biljetten.

Ik heb hierbij soms een toevoeging in de tekst gemaakt na het uitvoerig bestuderen van de regels.

Voorbeeld - er stond ca 10 keer een zilverbon 1 gulden Nederland 1938 in de catalogus terwijl er in de Pick en Nederlandse catalogus slechts 2 types bekend zijn (handtekeningen)

Ik heb er 8 gedoubleerd en aan de bestaande het pick nummer in de tekst toegevoegd. As dit niet mag haal ik het weer terug. Waar ik achter kom is dat als ik twee biljetten tegenkom met een ander pick nummer, niet altijd het verschil is weergegeven in de tekst. Aan ieder die dit doet, graag ook aangeven wat dan het verschil is.

Some things take longer than others and more users means more errors. Apparently some users are unable to look at what has already been categorized and are re-posting all their notes - and in many cases with very bad photo work too.

Anyway, joint work offers joint joy, last week I marked dozens of duplications as duplications and also added various extra items as variants of the notes that had already been introduced.

I have sometimes made an addition to the text after studying the rules in detail.

Example - there was a silver voucher 1 guilder Netherlands 1938 in the catalog about 10 times, while only 2 types are known in the Pick and Dutch catalog (signatures)

I doubled 8 and added the pick number in the text to the existing ones. If this is not allowed, I will take it back. What I find out is that when I come across two banknotes with a different pick number, the difference is not always reflected in the text. To anyone who does this, please also indicate what the difference is.

There is a lot of doubleures in Indonesia,

But this one is too crazy 4979923 both the old description (year is not 2000, the real one is illegible due to the bad scan) and the value is only 20 cents instead of the claimed 4 euros, an administrator can throw these out?

Are there any administrators active in this section?

6121269 may also be disapproved.

There are two more active administrators there. One has canceled due to lack of time. Do I have to process ... It's not a mega-category, so it should be theoretically workable.

If I, as a super administrator, can change / merge / adjust things, please let me know,

Mvg. Pokie