LastDodo site & app/Own images required when offering more expensive items78 messages

I am more concerned about the supply that is not included with the correct item.

I tried to buy a coin: was for sale 3x as a separate item. Questions asked about the item whether a specific point was correct.
First reaction "No, my item is different"
Second reaction "No, my item is different, I am creating a new item"
Third reaction "Yes, is what you are looking for"

Third coin bought, is it wrong anyway, has a different mark on it than I was / am looking for. It won't be ill will, but it is annoying.

January 1 and now?

I would like to add more photos

vinyl is an afterthought to me what's on cw is all I have

a lot of photos can be placed at auctions

but in the shop only 3

I had thorgal luxe 19 books now only had photos of the front but photo back of spines could have been added

that was not possible

and I will enter if I want to sell

I have other hobbies such as cw catalog complete make everyone their own.

Of course I added bulk, they are there, but the discussion is not about that

I hitch a ride

and be happy that I enter what who imports what does not matter,

that nonsense about us collectors

we traders are put down by your disney as a big angry mister / madam

who by grace may participate in this site sorry but that site is not yours

but rene and marco

I pay if I sell something

thanks to the efforts of we traders, you can go well ahead

without the traders there is no cw or do you want to spend € 20,000 + pieces every month ?????

@Disney,

This topic is not about adding images to the catalog but about adding your own photos when selling expensive items.

The latter has nothing to do with the catalog but with sales in the shops. Own photos sell better. Tino already agreed with this as you can read in an earlier post of him in this topic.

Try to hold the line of the topic or start a new topic if you can't post your story.

I have also been quoted again and it is correct it is about shops

But if you place the scan there it is of course quite easy to add to the item as well, that seems a small effort

And as a shop you can also indicate that you have placed those scans, yet also a positive contribution to Catawiki

it does have some common ground

Alles heeft raakvlakken met elkaar als je het woord strips noemt Dick. Maar omdat we merken dat sommige posters van een nieuw topic zien gebeuren dat hun topic wordt gekaapt door zo'n raakvlak willen we als moderator vragen of iedereen zich aan het topic wil houden en anders iets nieuws wil starten als er belangrijke raakvlakken zijn.

Dus Dick en Disney; Ik nodig jullie van harte uit om een nieuw topic over de invoer van covers bij een catalogusitem te starten.

Everything has common ground if you call the word comics Dick. But because we notice that some posters of a new topic see their topic being hijacked by such an interface, we as moderators would like to ask everyone to stick to the topic and otherwise start something new if there are important interfaces.

So Dick and Disney; I cordially invite you to start a new topic about importing covers for a catalog item.

that nonsense about us collectors we traders are put down by your disney as a big angry mister / madam who by grace may participate in this site sorry but that site is not yours van rene and marco I pay if I sell something thanks to the efforts of we traders, you can go ahead without the traders, there is no cw or do you want € 20,000 + patches every month ?????

But you also have a very nice and great site at your disposal for this

With many volunteers and a very large target group!

A showcase that you say to yourself! An advertising column all over the net, where do you not find catawiki?

We collectors need you, but also vice versa.

And divide that twenty by the number of pro shops per shop. you come close to the decimal point 0, ...... even if it is per month

Okay Rik, but the question DM also asked what about those mandatory scans from January 1, you might be able to answer that?

Okay Rik, but the question DM also asked what about those mandatory scans from January 1, you might be able to answer that?

The answer to this question must come from Rene. Unfortunately I cannot help you with this.

but Dick was not the first to stray from the topic.

Yes, but you have to start somewhere if you want to structure the forum better.

I would also like to say that I am against censorship and dictation

I also Jouke; At least there are two of us :-)

and who enters what does not matter as long as it happens

patience

Maar nu weet ik nog steeds niet!Hoe zit het met die verplichte scan?Hier nog een voorbeeld Catawiki 2098311De start van het topic was toch ................

Zojuist nog even getest, maar het lukte mij nu ook om een item van € 150 te koop te zetten zonder eigen foto.
Daar dit wel heeft gewerkt, zal er ergens een schakelaar per ongeluk omgezet zijn. De techneuten zijn gevraagd hier naar te kijken.

But now I still don't know! What about the mandatory scan? Here's another example Catawiki 2098311 The start of the topic was ................

Just tested, but I now also managed to put an item for sale for € 150 without my own photo.
Since this did work, there must be a switch somewhere that was accidentally turned. The technicians have been asked to look into this.

. @ Collector has it only worked in test environment?

No, it has worked throughout the catalog. Problem has been recognized, it will be looked into tomorrow.