Comic ex-libris/Suske and Wiske18 messages

Ik heb een vraag over de vierkleurenreeks van suske en wiske. Het gaat om nr 82 uit de reeks: de gramme huurling.

Dit is het catawiki nummer: 27166

Ik heb exact hetzelfde exemplaar als hier staat omschreven. Dus het

Laatste albumtitel: De gramme huurling.
Datum uitgave: 1/8/68.
Depotnummer: D/1968/0034/124.

Echter er staat ook bij bijzonderheden dat er geen ISBN op de achterkant hoort te staan. Echter op mijn exemplaar staat wel een ISBN namelijk: 9002106998

Weet iemand hoe dit precies zit?

I have a question about the four-color series of Suske and Wiske. It is number 82 in the series: the gramme mercenary.

This is the catalog number: 27166

I have the exact same one as described here. So it

Last album title: The gramme mercenary.
Issue date: 8/1/68.
Deposit number: D/1968/0034/124.

However, it also says in the details that there should be no ISBN on the back. However, my copy does have an ISBN: 9002106998

Does anyone know exactly what this is?

If it does have an ISBN on it, the album is not from 1968, but somewhere from the 1970s.

But place the item in CataWiki with clear scan of the actor side with ISBN and we see further

ok very strange then because it says 1/8/68 on the back. how is that possible?

also looks exactly the same.

Moreover, when I look at the images of other providers I see that several people offer this album with isbn as the first edition.

if it is not a first edition then it is quite disappointing. yesterday during the comic days in Haarlem paid 20 euros for this comic.

A number of the early matte four-color albums have been reprinted with glossy cover and ISB number. The covers are identical with the exception of the ISBnr's.

This probably happened in 1970 or 1971.

In any case, there is also such a version of the Roaring Berg and the Mad Griet.

I had not heard this from the gramme mercenary (nr 82).

ok thanks!

I do have another question about the catalog value of the four-color series. I see that the catalog value of many albums has been adjusted (usually downwards). What are those prices actually based on? Is the average calculated of the albums that are offered?

I have heard that every 5 years the value of a comic doubles, is that correct?

Incidentally, the catalog value of 'De dulle griet' is in my opinion much too low and has probably been adjusted incorrectly. Now it is at 6, 4.5, 3 and 1.5.

I do have another question about the catalog value of the four-color series. I see that the catalog value of many albums has been adjusted

As stated in another post, the four-color range is currently under review. The managers who are working on this at least have good expertise in the field of Suske en Wiske.

I have heard that every 5 years the value of a comic doubles, is that correct?

The comic market is not so simple that you can put it that way. As with many other industries, it is about supply and demand.

This means that this will probably apply to rare and sought after albums in top condition, but that for many albums this assumption is unfortunately not correct.

Many of the albums in the latter category are more likely to stabilize or even fall than rise in price.

Incidentally, the catalog value of 'De dulle griet' is in my opinion much too low and has probably been adjusted incorrectly. Now it is at 6, 4.5, 3 and 1.5.

It is not clear to me exactly which Mad Griet you are referring to here, but for reprints from the four-color series, with large editions, this is the right price.

het gaat om dit exemplaar:

this is the copy:

You are absolutely right; The value is too low for this album. I have set it back to the same value as the other version.

This is the matte 1967 edition and the first in the four-color series.

In addition, a laminated edition (without ISB number) has also been published in the same version.

Only the first 15 editions of the 4 color series have been matte editions.

Van de vroege matte vierkleurenalbums zijn er een aantal herdrukt met glanzende kaft en ISBnummer. De kaften zijn m.u.v. de ISBnr's identiek.

Some of the early matte four-color albums have been reprinted with glossy covers and ISB numbers. The covers are identical with the exception of the ISBnr's.

Incidentally, I have no doubts about Ivo's expertise, but a edition from 1968 that was re-released in 2007 with a free CD, that seems somewhat unlikely

You can see from the alignment of Vandersteen's name on the front cover that it is indeed not the same copies.

It is therefore not a copy from 1968 that was re-released with CD in 2007. To avoid confusion, figure 3 has been removed from this release.

Then the reference to the Particulars may also be removed ?!

And if I may believe the images, this is not a standard Standard issued copy. On the back it clearly says N.V. Scriptoria!?

That's only the copyright, DisneyMeentwijc ... not the publisher.

Well, it does say: Responsible publisher: N.V. Scriptoria

But for albums from 1968 to 1971 that is apparently the standard (;-))

The responsible publisher is not always the publisher of the book in Belgium, as you undoubtedly know. But Belgian legislation is different from the Dutch in this regard. For example, in many Belgian books / magazines you also see a private name as the responsible publisher. That is actually something like in the books of publisher Silvester, where Silvio van der Loo is mentioned as the publisher. In such cases it is more the function than the name of the publisher.

bij de suske en wiske in de catalogus zijn aanpassingen gedaan.

Nu zijn bij een aantal de covers van de strips weg?

Kan dit worden nagekeken/hersteld?

gegevens van laatste wijziging geven aan:

Laatst gewijzigd op:06-12-2015 09:38:17

Laatst gewijzigd door:stripspeldjes

adjustments have been made to the Suske en wiske in the catalogue.

Now some of the covers of the comics are gone?

Can this be checked/repaired?

data of last change indicates:

Last modified on:06-12-2015 09:38:17

Last edited by: strip pins

Then they were stolen covers and not the importer's own scans. They will be removed as soon as we discover it ...

Yes, I indulged myself ;-)

It is a pity that I could not (as they do on Wikipedia) provide my changes with a note, but if you go to the History of the concerning items you will see that the majority of those covers were stamp sized scans with double watermarks.

A good scan of the back was added to many of those items later, but unfortunately without replacing the scan of the front.

So the owners of these comics are still allowed to do so. do.