Coins/Front and back loose photos!30 messages

The appointment is:

Photo 1 = photo with year

Photo 2 = other side

No exceptions. Not even if it has a cute elephant on it, or if it is the only coin of that kind.

Note: this means: no photos of coins where the front and back are on 1 photo.

Unfortunately, I have again rejected a number of these types of inputs today. If you take photos yourself, which we generally assume at Catawiki, this should not be a problem.

If you take photos yourself, which we generally assume at Catawiki

Opinions within Catawiki differ on this.

My opinion is known. in favor of!

Splitting photos shouldn't be a problem with simple programs like paint or zapgrab in combination with paint, it's done like this.

@ DirkV,

maybe not a point to split, but who should do that?

It just seems to me that he / she who performs the item has to stick to the agreements and they seem clear to me.

I was also referring to!

foto 2 niet aanwezig : 1942237  2058613  2058649  2063927 

Gr, Ron.

photo 2 not present: 1942237 2058613 2058649 2063927 

Gr, Ron.

Also photo 2 is not present: ? 1344387

1344387 is photo 2.

photo 2 not present: 1222257

Gr. Ron.

2058649 2058613 1222257

Just "swipe" the sellers' pictures?

Unfortunately, that is not easy, because then the watermark will be burned into the image. Very ugly in print catalogs or collections from Catawiki.
So only possible after photo jumps.

We could automatically add "own" images of sellers and collectors that we do not have in the catalog, such as in this case the 2nd image, to the catalog. Of course, administrators can still reject it if it is an unacceptable image. Is that an idea? With comics it even happens that sellers or collectors have their own image but the catalog does not yet have an image at all

With comics it even happens that sellers or collectors have their own image but the catalog does not yet have an image at all

Everything is possible, of course, but do you have one (or more) examples? I myself have not (consciously) encountered this phenomenon.

Everything is possible, of course, but do you have one (or more) examples? I myself have not (consciously) encountered this phenomenon.

I've seen it many times, mainly on comics. Even made a post about it I think, look it up tomorrow if you want.

And yes that is a very good idea, maybe with 'change images' not only provide the catalogs images but also the 'for sale' images if that is programmatically feasible. Otherwise it is of course pointless if there is already a second or third image.

PS: apologies for breaking into Coins Forum, but this is actually valid for all sections.

I have come across it many times, but unfortunately I don't have an example ready

I am most ahead of what Scam says. To begin with, add as functionality to 'Change images'.

How exactly do you envision that when you change image you can choose from your own images of buyers or collectors? There may be several. Wouldn't it be more convenient to add it automatically as soon as someone adds an "own photo" that we don't have in the catalog yet?

In theory, it can happen that people add their own logo to a photo for their store, precisely because they do not want others to use their photo.

You see that often at E-bay now, and if you want to use photos of stores in the catalog, this will be reason for certain people to add their own characteristic to their photo.
Since it is a photo from their store, you can not really say anything about it.

What also often happens is that the photo from a store is better than the photo from the photo in the catalog.
Then you will basically want to replace the catalog photo.

These are already 2 reasons not to do it automatically, but manually.
At most, the system should be able to signal that there might be a (better) photo in stock.

you can also choose to give a notification if a seller adds a photo to his own sales copy that there is no photo (1st or 2nd) in Catawiki and that the photo will also be added there. He / she must then ensure that there is no own logo on it.

The danger is that there are quite a few sellers who sell reprints (comics) at 1st editions in CW and that a wrong photo will appear in Catawiki, so that is not a good idea ....

And can a reviewer check whether that (often 2nd) photo is indeed the back of the CW item (think of comics with its many different reprints)?

It just has to be very simple.

as soon as an item has not been fully added we will talk about coins here but that does not matter, it is not possible to offer for sale!

once you want to do this make item complete

And complete is required with 2 scans! in addition, I can imagine the diameter, dimensions, mandatory and year of coins and maybe something else.

the danger of reprints when selling is not an issue

the changes must be approved not properly added simply rejected and therefore also from the shop

And can a reviewer check whether that (often 2nd) photo is indeed the back of the CW item (think of comics with its many different reprints)?

he can't do that either when an item is added he has the same problem.

the danger of reprints when selling is not an issue

anyway, because if you add the automatism that the 2nd photo of an item to be sold also ends up in CW itself, then it can happen that you add a reprint back to a 1st printing front. Simply because reprints of 1st editions are offered for sale ...

Ik had net op het forum dit weer eens van stal gehaald gisteren

Afspraken over toevoegen gegevens > Afbeeldingen

Afbeeldingen bij boeken, strips, munten, suikerzakjes etc. minimaal 2 stuks wil je als catalogus toegevoegde waarde hebben!

Nu zit er nog steeds oud zeer in dat moet de tijd dan maar oplossen

Maar als de stelregel wordt zodra je iets te koop aanbiedt moet item volledig ingevuld zijn.

Dan heb je al minimaal 2 scans

Kan me bij boeken/strips munten voorstellen afmetingen verplicht

Vanaf een bepaald jaartal ISBN verplicht of andersom niet mogelijk

Bij muziek zou het moeten zijn geen CD  van voor 1980 dat is lijkt me technisch geen groot probleem. Om te maken.

Dat zijn zo al 2 redenen om het niet automatisch, maar handmatig te doen.
Het systeem zou hooguit moeten kunnen signaleren dat er misschien een (betere) foto voorradig is.

de foto's zijn beter?

Dit kan toch ook niet

de Blauwe Lotus

heeft geen toegevoegde waarde voor catalogus.  had dat wel kunnen zijn

I just brought this up again on the forum yesterday

Agreements about adding data > Images

Images for books, comics, coins, sugar sachets, etc. At least 2 pieces if you want to have added value as a catalog!

Now there is still an old sore in it, time will have to solve it

But as the rule becomes as soon as you offer something for sale, item must be filled in completely.

Then you already have at least 2 scans

Can imagine coins for books/comics dimensions required

From a certain year ISBN is mandatory or vice versa not possible

With music it should not be a CD from before 1980, which is technically not a big problem. To make.

Those are already 2 reasons not to do it automatically, but manually.
At most, the system should be able to signal that a (better) photo may be available.

the pictures are better?

This is also not possible

the Blue Lotus

has no added value for catalogue. could have been

anyway, because if you add the automatism that the 2nd photo of an item to be sold also ends up in CW itself, then it can happen that you add a reprint back to a 1st printing front. Simply because reprints of 1st editions are offered for sale ...

This danger is always present but it has nothing to do with placing the scans

if we make sure that the pictures are preferably 3 pictures at the first press, nothing will be replaced and suppose there is only 1 picture and a seller places the wrong picture with his item for sale with 3 pictures, then the change will be rejected and the description the wrong one will then simply be rejected

This is also not possible

Yes, that's why I am also against automatic adjustment of items.

By the way, who says that a seller of an item always uses the back as the second image?

He might as well place a photo there that clearly shows any damage to the item.

I always put a nude photo of myself on spot 2 in my shop to stimulate sales ... Just not so good.

But no kidding: in addition to all the practical objections, in my opinion, sellers do not give permission at all according to the Catawiki regulations for the use of the own images in the catalog.